TOP TEN (OR FOURTEEN) INDICATORS OF ILLEGAL MOTIVE - A PLAINTIFF'S PERSPECTIVE


Submitted by:
James S. Weliky
Messing, Rudavsky & Weliky, P.C.
50 Congress Street, Suite 1000
Boston, MA 02109
(617) 742-0004
(c) 2006 James S. Weliky


•  Sudden threats of termination and/or termination for performance problems where no prior communications to the employee about those problems

•  Absence of contemporaneous documentation of performance problems

•  Post hoc attempts to “document” performance problems

•  Failure to follow established disciplinary policies

•  Failure to follow established evaluation procedures

•  Inconsistent application of established practices or policies

•  Contradictory, embellished or inconsistent statements of reasons for adverse actions

•  In reductions-in-force, retention of younger, less experienced co-workers for no defensible reason

•  In reductions-in-force, sudden transfers of younger, less experienced co-workers shortly before announcement of layoffs

•  One or two person “reduction-in-force”

•  Sudden intensive scrutiny where none previously and/or where no prior indication of work difficulties

•  Punishing the victim in harassment cases, e.g. putting the accuser on leave rather than the accused, transferring the accuser out of the accused's department

•  Manipulation of the promotion or hiring process so that only desired candidates “qualify”

•  Demanding detailed health records to document disability and providing them to supervisor and/or supervisor asking employee if she/he has a disability

 
 
 
 
 

This web page may be considered "advertising" under Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Rule 3:07. The information presented on this page does not constitute legal advice, which can only be rendered after a full consideration of the facts in your case; nor establish an attorney-client relationship, which can only be done after you and an attorney meet and agree on the terms of that relationship.

Copyright © 2006 Messing, Rudavsky & Weliky, P.C. All Rights Reserved.